Feed Rss



Jun 04 2009

Home Death Revelation!

category: Death author: Indra

in the cloudsI watched the documentary “A Family Undertaking” last night.  It’s about home funerals. I already had a hunch that I was as much of a death radical as I am a birth radical and this video (available on Netlix) confirmed it: bring on the fleshy, life-affirming, love-emanating reality of death!

Of course, I mean “radical” here as in “affecting the fundamental nature of something” because giving birth and dying are not radical in the “departure from tradition” sense of the word.  It should be a clue to our profound deviation that recognizing the fundamental nature of birth and death has become such a departure from tradition.

What inspires me about birth and death as sites of cultural struggle is that our life-force is in spades there, in birth and death we have the capacity to be deeply connected to what Audre Lorde describes as our erotic power.*  I like to use that phrase because it taps in to a core hunger that we can all lean into and revel in.   And we need that core hunger activated to reclaim our birthing and dying.

When we institutionalize these threshold moments we institutionalize our life force. Can you imagine conscripting your erotic power to an undertaker?  And yet that is what so many do.  While most people in the United States want to die at home only about 30% do (and only 1% of us give birth, or are born, at home).

This movie exposed the myths that lead so many to believe that they can’t die or care for their loved ones in death without the aid of institutional services.  We don’t need to be embalmed (in fact it’s better for the environment if we’re not).  We don’t need fancy caskets (send me to the light in a cardboard box that we all decorate like a love-package).  We don’t need funeral directors (I want Muppets, poetry and silly hats!).  We can even hang out at home after we’ve died for a few days while everyone soaks in the reality that our souls are no longer housed in our bodies.

And what’s more, this is deeply, deeply healthy for our individuals but also for our shared ecology. Not only the ecology of living and dying things, but also the ecology of culture and ideas.  We are cookie-cuttered in packaged funerals and packaged births. Our communal erotic power is spent like so many loveless pornifications depleting our creative reserves.

But when we die and give birth at home, among loved ones, when we care for these bodies on the threshold with our own hands and hearts (fearful, cracked open, in awe as we may be) we celebrate our erotic power, give birth to ourselves, release the life force, palpable, into the air we breathe.  We become the air we breathe.

——————-

* Audre Lorde “Uses of the Erotic: The Erotic as Power” in Sister Outsider.  She defines the erotic as “an internal sense of satisfaction to which, once we have experienced it we know we can aspire” and in my paraphrasing: An internal requirement towards excellence which does not demand the impossible, but rather invites us into a fullness and depth of feeling that necessitates that we honor ourselves by not settling for the convenient the shoddy the conventionally expected, nor the merely safe.

Some resources on Home Funerals and Death:

Final Passages in California

Crossings in Maryland

Funeral Consumers Alliance, a federation of groups.

Natural Transitions in Colorado

and Dying a Natural Passage by Denys Cope


May 08 2009

How We Bond

category: Bonding author: Indra

img_0266I just packed for my partner who has a camping trip with 20 teenagers this weekend.  It’s a division of labor that suits our nearly 17 year relationship; she hates to pack, I kind of like it, love her by doing it.  This afternoon, my two kiddos, comfortably stripped down to boxers for their annual pediatric exam, so gorgeous in their transitory states, so comfortable with mom-as-witness, I, breathless with the honor of being theirs.

And then I think about the relative who has been calling me more, and I think it’s because he has disappointed and offended the rest of my family too much recently, and I’m a safe bet. Makes me think about the kind of companionship that comes from decades of bouncing off the same soft walls of family together: distance, proximity, alienation, recognition.

Just read this post about a mom who wanted to have a natural labor, and breastfeed, and found childbirth and parenting anything but how she expected it; ended up a bottle-mama, felt the pangs of derision calling out from magazine covers touting “Breast is Best.”  Had the opposite experience with her second, found joy and derision there too.  She has visited both worlds and finds some sense of comfort in the undefined gray where most of parenting lives. Speaking of  that gray gets me thinking about Rev. Renita Weems’ recent ponderings about the power of dads, and how that fits with my chosen-niece’s dad-free family, and my own kids’ four parent variety (and the nuances of gender and roles it creates).

And I’m considering the question posed by queerradical when he wonders whether there is really anything radical about poly-kinky sex and invites us to create spaces for collective sharing of sensuous skills. This, against the backdrop of a recent Massachusetts bill that aims to protect the disabled by making sexual images of certain adults with disabilities illegal, members of the disability and sexuality performance troupe Sins Invalid are not so sure that the  law would protect them.

Which reminds me of how much trouble one can get in mentioning breastfeeding and your own kids in boxers within the same few lines that you mention kinky sexuality.  And maybe rightfully so, because those same soft walls of family have done some serious damage to folks in the way of sexuality: distance, proximity, alienation, recognition.

And yet here we are.  Brought together. Bonding in all sorts of inexplicable ways.  Embodied.  Here we are embodied.eliotlookinup

I meditate on that quite often. So many times I have said to myself “but I have a body, I still have a body.”  I dismantled my whole sexuality, deconstructed all attachments I had built up for myself even around my supposedly liberated radical poly kinkiness.  I took it all apart like so many lego pieces scattered out on the floor in front of me.  And it was awesome.  And now sometimes I see myself like a shell cracking open and myself, light-soul-essence flowing out.  But when I went to reconstruct the pile, it still pretty much amounted to the same me.

As Catholic feminist theologist Mary Hunt says, “Bodies Don’t Lie.” And if that’s the case, what do we know about how we bond? How our bondings continually ebb and flow, wax and wane, except - do they ever really die?  And what does that tell us about the meaning of life?

Haven’t seen my partner now for what feels like days, I’ve got to go show her the suitcase, what I have packed, and then sit down to enjoy a little LOST before she’s off for the weekend.  In the meantime, I’m still tinkering with the legos…


Apr 30 2009

Can’t

category: Birth, Death author: Indra

img_0597Not everyone can bear children.  Not everyone will bear children in the same way, or with the same outcome. The reasons for this vary widely.  Sometimes there are no reasons.

In the United States 7.4% of women ages 15-44 are infertile (and almost 12% have impaired fertility). Worldwide, infertility seems to range from 3-10%.

But these numbers are intended only to suggest scope.  For someone who tries and wants to bear children but can’t, the numbers don’t matter much, the sense of loss is personal.   In some parts of the world the consequences are severe, women who can’t bear children may be abandoned, stigmatized.

As someone who got pregnant easily, without complication, and who also focuses on childbirth as a site of personal and social change reckoning with infertility and other experiences of life that do not include childbirth are essential to fully exploring this territory of birth-bonding-death, toward a theory of life.

Though I am in no position to offer perspective on the lived experience of infertility, I humbly ask for insight from those who can, and who might also seek to protect the farthest reaches of childbearing without adding insult to injury for those who grieve. (This applies also to those who grieve childbirth experiences that were traumatic or disappointing, who live with disabilities,  and in a different way to those who raise their own children through adoption, or choose not to bear children.)

I am convinced that the machinery of our childbirth culture which threatens birth-bonding-death also stigmatizes infertility, childlessness, adoption, disability and sustains the trauma that it seeks to relieve.  So I am interested in breaking down barriers here so that we might better see our alliances and work together for our humanity.

Briefly, two components of that machinery are a resistance to death*, and the concept of normal.

In terms of birth, resistance to death shows up in the risk-based assessment of care, the focus on pathology, increased c-section rates, electronic fetal monitoring, litigation for infant mortality, and even in the avoidance of grief that people who’ve had traumatic births regularly hear “at least you have a healthy baby.”

This last comment signals the problem of normalcy, which is not so much about what is normal (”a healthy baby”) but is rather about a sort of standardization of bodies and life experience (characteristics XYZ=healthy baby).  In birth, standardization confines what is perceived as “safe” within arbitrary parameters, and limits what is possible from our bodies and souls.

The discomfort with grief and loss as a part of life (death) and standardization of our bodies and experiences effects us all regardless of childbearing by turning us into citizens “whose actions are governed through the exercise of [our] own capacity to choose in accordance with the norm(al).”  (quoting from Shelley Tremain in “Reproductive Freedom, Self-Regulation, and the Government of Impairment in Utero”)

I’ll leave you with that provocative notion and my humble request for insight from those with different experiences of childbearing than mine (acknowledging that there is way more to be said about death, risk, safety, standardization, normalcy, and our shared responsibility for it all).
——–
* it occurs to me that it’s not just a resistance to death but a sort of fetishizing of death based on denial-that-gives-the-denied-excessive-power.